Services Insights About Case Studies Get in touch
PL EN
EST. 2018 / WARSAW - BRUSSELS
Chapter 03 · Case Studies

Work
you won't see
in the press.

Public affairs clients don't advertise that they need counsel - and as a rule, they do not allow their names to be cited. Below are six cases that consented to publication in anonymised form.

Energy · Poland
Regulated sector / 2024

Adverse legislation blocked in 14 days.

A renewable energy market leader faced a sudden legislative change threatening to block PLN 1.2bn in investment. No time, no broad coalition, ambiguous industry stance. Full decision-maker mapping, a coalition of four players, a written submission reaching three key committees within 72 hours.

14 days
from brief to effective amendment in committee
FMCG · European Union
Multi-stakeholder / 2023-2024

An industry position, where there was none.

A food sector producer had no representation in Brussels during consultations on a directive affecting the entire category. Building a coalition of nine companies, a unified industry position, working meetings with DG SANTE and DG GROW, technical briefs for the Parliament rapporteur.

-45%
regulatory risk reduction in the final directive text
Finance · Poland/EU
Reputational crisis / 2024

First wave of headlines, last statement - case closed.

A listed company in the financial sector faced a series of articles erroneously linking it to regulator action against another entity. Risk: share price drop, regulator intervention, escalation. Crisis war room within 4 hours, one position approved at board level, coordination with counsel, briefings for five key journalists.

36h
until the media narrative was contained and the share price recovered
Tech · Poland
Regulatory Intelligence / 2023-present

Three years of silence - and zero surprises.

A Polish technology unicorn approaching the AI Act, NIS2 and DMA regulatory phase. Continuous monitoring, quarterly regulatory briefs to the board, monthly hot updates, ad hoc analyses in urgent moments. No surprises, no firefighting, product decisions taken 18-24 months ahead of the curve.

0
regulatory incidents during the engagement period
Healthcare · Poland
Government Relations / 2022-2023

One meeting. Three years of work.

A healthcare sector manufacturer had spent 24 months trying to include its technology in the reimbursement system. No foothold in the ministry, no advocate for the case. Mapping of second-line decision-makers, briefings for department directors, a narrative built on pharmacoeconomic data rather than PR promises.

PLN 42m
annual system savings following reimbursement decision
Telecoms · EU
Stakeholder Engagement / 2024

Six stakeholder groups. One investment decision.

A PLN 800m infrastructure investment was blocked for 14 months by local community opposition, two environmental NGOs, and an unfavourable position from one of the regional governors. Ecosystem mapping, parallel dialogue with each group, integration of their positions into a unified project narrative.

5 mo.
to obtain final approvals after the change of approach
— First conversation —

Each of these projects began with one conversation.

There is no case that cannot be discussed in thirty minutes. We'll see whether you have something worth taking on.